New provisional data released by the NHS has revealed the increasing frequency of so called ‘never events’ - incidents so serious they should simply never occur.
What is a ‘never event’?
The term ‘never events’ covers a particularly serious set of preventable medical errors. There are a number of types of never event. For example:
- wrong site surgery
- wrong patient surgery
- retained foreign objects after a procedure such as a swab
- wrong implant or prosthesis
- wrong administration of medication
- falls from poorly restricted windows
- scalding of patients
These incidents are termed ‘never events’ because they are events which are generally accepted to be avoidable and should never occur in a safe healthcare system.
Never events represent a clear failure on the part of individual healthcare providers – and, more worryingly, provisional data suggests that these often-terrifying events occurred 424 times in the NHS in 2016-17.
Get in touch
How common are ‘never events’ in the NHS?
The Provisional Publication of the Never Events Data in the NHS 2016-2017 reports that wrong site or wrong patient surgeries happened more than twice a week. Throughout the year, 42 procedures took place on the wrong tooth. In 13 cases, the wrong skin lesion was removed. Other errors included a knee operation on the wrong knee, removal of ovaries when the plan was to conserve and operating on the wrong patient. In other cases, patients received the wrong procedure entirely.
There were 109 incidents involving retained foreign objects post procedure, with reported incidences of items such as vaginal swabs (31 incidents), wires (24 incidents), swabs (22 incidents), drill bits, surgical needles, and drains being left inside patients.
Campaigners have been quick to comment on these concerning statistics. Peter Walsh, Chief Executive of Action Against Medical Accidents said: “Never events by definition are perfectly avoidable incidents which often cause serious harm or death. The number of them that are being reported remains disturbingly high.”
Legal support for patients affected by preventable medical errors
At Tees, we meet patients affected by never events – and see first-hand how their lives have been changed by preventable medical errors. For example:
Drain left inside the body following hernia repair
Mr C underwent surgery to repair a hernia. Following the operation, he suffered significant problems with his surgical wound which broke down and needed a follow-up procedure called ‘surgical debridement’ (where dead, damaged or infected tissue is removed). At this point it was discovered that a surgical drain more than six inches long had been left in his abdomen during surgery. The drain had retracted back inside Mr C as a safety pin had not been put on the end of the drain to prevent this.
During the debridement, a large section of tissue had to be removed from his naval. The procedure left a significant wound in his abdomen that required dressings for several weeks and resulted in a very tight scar which Mr C found restricting and painful when reaching, lifting, or bending.
Tees successfully pursued the case against the hospital and Mr C received compensation of £35,000 in settlement of his claim. After the case had resolved, Mr C wrote “I can’t thank you enough for your and your teams help during our journey”.
Wrong procedure (colonoscopy) performed on the wrong patient
Tees recently settled a case where a patient received the wrong medical treatment. The medical staff failed to correctly identify him, check his medical notes or refer to the details shown on his medical consent form.
Because the staff failed to follow procedure, Mr C found went through an extremely painful colonoscopy. He had only been prepared for - and given consent to - a flexible sigmoidoscopy, which is a far less invasive procedure.
When Mr C arrived for his treatment, he was the only patient in the waiting area and was called through by the surgeon but not by name. Mr C told the staff what preparation he’d done for the procedure, and they should have identified from what he said that this wasn’t the correct preparation for a colonoscopy.
This should have alerted them to the mistakes they were about to make. However, they didn’t listen and the procedure was attempted. Eventually the procedure was stopped, but only after Mr C had suffered unnecessary and avoidable pain and distress. The clinicians also failed to correctly document what had happened to Mr G in his medical notes.
Our client’s case, that the entire surgery was an assault and battery due to the failure by staff to correctly identify him, that the experience had been embarrassing, very painful and highly distressing, was successful. Negligence was proved and the case settled, with Mr C receiving £1,500 in compensation.
Wrong site surgery - operation on the wrong eye
A gentleman in his thirties suffered unnecessary pain and psychological trauma as a result of an ophthalmologist carrying out a surgical procedure on the wrong eye.
The man had been suffering from a particularly large and painful stye on his left eyelid. Other treatments, such as antibiotics and topical treatments were tried but unsuccessful. Therefore he was referred for an ophthalmic procedure whereby, under a local anaesthetic, a small incision is made in the eyelid to excise the stye.
Unfortunately,the surgeon failed to properly consult the referral documentation and performed the procedure on the right eye instead of the left. By the time the patient was aware of what was happening, he was in total shock and was unable to speak out.
The patient did not have a stye at all on his right eye and it remains a mystery as to what the surgeon thought he was operating on. However, the patient’s large and painful cyst remained and it was almost four months before he was able to get an appointment to undergo the procedure a second time, to treat the stye on his left eye.
The patient suffered unnecessary pain and discomfort for a period of approximately four months. He also underwent a completely unnecessary surgical procedure on his right eye under a local anaesthetic.
Tees successfully pursued a claim against the hospital concerned. Liability was admitted and we recovered £2,500 in compensation for the patient.